Key trials exploring the role of FARAPULSE PFA
IMPULSE, PEFCAT, PEFCAT II20,21
First-In-Human Trials
121 patients
ADVENT22,23
Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing FARAPULSE PFA with Thermal Energy Ablation
607 patients
SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION27
Comparison of Cryoballoon vs Pulsed Field Ablation in Paroxysmal AF (RCT)
121 patients
IMPULSE, PEFCAT, PEFCAT II20,21
First-In-Human (FIH) Trials: IMPULSE: FIH safety and feasibility, monophasic and biphasic I waveforms
PEFCAT: FIH safety and feasibility, biphasic I & II waveforms
PEFCAT II: FIH expanded safety and feasibility, biphasic II waveform
Patients #
121
Patient Population
Paroxysmal AF (PVI)
Location
Croatia (PEFCAT II) | Czech Republic | (IMPULSE, PEFCAT, PEFCAT II) | France (IMPULSE, PEFCAT)
Study Goal & Design
Goal: Find the optimised waveform with highest efficacy and safety outcomes
Design:
- Multicentre
- Prospective
- Single-arm
- Safety and feasibility
- Prospective remapping was performed in 110 patients at 2-3 months post-procedure
Key findings
- Acute PVI achieved in 100% PVs
- Durable PVI achieved in 96% of PVs treated with optimised biphasic PFA (84% for all PVs)
- 1-year Kaplan Meier estimate freedom from any atrial arrythmia: 84.5% patients treated with optimised biphasic PFA (78.5% for whole cohort)
- 5-year follow up showed 81% freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in patients treated with optimised biphasic PFA (73% for whole cohort)21
AF: Atrial fibrillation; FIH: First in human; PFA: Pulsed field ablation; PV: Pulmonary vein; PVI: Pulmonary vein isolation
ADVENT25,26 US IDE TRIAL
Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing
FARAPULSE PFA with Thermal Energy
Patients #
607
Patient Population
Paroxysmal AF (PVI)
Location
USA
Study Goal & Design
Goal: Establish Non-inferiority of the FARAPULSE PFA system to standard of care (thermal ablation) in terms of safety and effectiveness
Design:
- Multicentre
- Prospective
- Blinded randomised (1:1) controlled trial
Key findings
- Composite primary effectiveness 73.3% in PFA arm vs. 71.3% in thermal arm
- Non-inferiority in terms of safety and effectiveness
- Significantly less pulmonary vein cross-sectional narrowing
- Significantly shorter procedure times
- Zero reported strokes
- Sequential sub-abalysis showed fewer atrial arrhythmia episodes, potentially resulting in better quality of life, lower risk for re-do ablation, cardioversion and hospitalisation23
AF: Atrial fibrillation; FIH: First in human; PFA: Pulsed field ablation; PV: Pulmonary vein; PVI: Pulmonary vein isolation
SINGLE-SHOT CHAMPION27
Comparison of Cryoballoon vs Pulsed field Ablation in Paroxysmal AF
Patients #
210 (PVI)
Patient Population
Symptomatic, drug-refrectory paroxysmal AF
Location
Switzerland
Study Goal & Design
Goal: Establish non-inferiority of the FARAPULSE PFA vs. Arctic Front™ Advance Cryoballoon
Design:
- Multicentre
- Prospective
- Randomised-controlled trial (1:1), blinded endpoint adjudication
- Continuous monitoring of AA burden post ablation with ICM
Key findings
- The overall major AE rates were very low, 1% in FARAPULSE patients
- FARAPULSE significantly reduced AA recurrence – 13.6% reduction vs. Arctic Front
- Comparable outcomes in clinical interventions and quality of life
- FARAPULSE procedures were 18 minutes shorter on average
AF: Atrial fibrillation; FIH: First in human; PFA: Pulsed field ablation; PV: Pulmonary vein; PVI: Pulmonary vein isolation
CAUTION: The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Indications, contraindications, warnings, and instructions for use can be found in the product labelling supplied with each device or at www.IFU-BSCI.com. Products shown for INFORMATION purposes only and may not be approved or for sale in certain countries. This material not intended for use in France.