Key trials exploring the role of FARAPULSE PFA
ADVANTAGE25,26
Prospective Multi-Centre Single-Arm Trial on Drug-Refractory, Symptomatic Persistent AF Patients
515 patients
AVANT GUARD40
Randomised Controlled IDE Trial of First-Line FARAPULSE PFA vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Persistent AF Patients
310 patients
ADVANTAGE21,22
Prospective Multi-Centre Single-Arm Trial on Drug-Refractory, Symptomatic Persistent AF Patients (2 Phases):
Patients #
515 across two phases:
- 260 Phase I
- 255 phase II
Patient Population
Persistent AF (PVI + PWA)
Location
International (49 sites)
Study Goal & Design
Goal:
- Phase I: IDE study to establish the safety and effectiveness of PVI+PWA using FARAWAVE
- Phase II: IDE study to establish:
- Safety and effectiveness of PVI+PWA using FARAWAVE catheter
- Safety and effectiveness of CTI ablation using FARAPOINT focal-linear PFA catheter
Design:
- Multicentre
- Prospective
- Single-arm
- Open-label
- Monitoring with ICM (Phase 2)
Key findings
- Primary safety and efficacy endpoints were met
- No reports of:
- Stroke
- PV stenosis
- Oesophageal fistula
- Pericardial tamponade
- Major vascular access complication
- Primary safety event rate 2.4%
- Primary effectiveness event-free rate at 12 months comparable to paroxysmal AF reported outcomes (73.4%)*
- 96.4% of patients treated with CTI line ablation with FARAPOINT had no recurrence of AFL
AVANT GUARD40
Randomised Controlled IDE Trial of First-Line FARAPULSE PFA vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Persistent AF Patients
Patients #
310 first-line Persistent AF patients:
- 207 FARAPULSE PFA
- 103 AAD therapy
Patient Population
PersAF (PVI+PWA)
Location
International (58 global centres)
Study Goal & Design
Goal:
- Compare FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation (FARAWAVE Catheter) with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy as first-line treatment for patients with persistent AF, evaluating both safety and effectiveness.
Design:
- Randomised controlled trial
- Prospective
- Multicentre
- Continuous rhythm monitoring with LUX-Dx™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor (ICM)
- 12-month follow-up
Key findings
- Primary safety and effectiveness endpoints met
- Superior primary effectiveness versus AAD therapy (56.0% vs 30.1% at 12 months)
- FARAPULSE reported higher freedom from recurrence at 12 months (51.7% vs 32.2%)
- Primary safety endpoint met: 5.1% major device- or procedure-related AE rate at 12 months, below the 12% safety performance goal
AF: Atrial fibrillation; AFL: Atrial flutter; CTI: Cavotricuspid isthmus; ICM: Implantable cardiac monitor; PAF: Persistent atrial fibrillation; PFA: Pulsed field ablation; PV: Pulmonary vein; PVI: Pulmonary vein isolation; PWA: Posterior wall ablation.
*Results from different clinical investigations are not directly comparable. Information provided for educational purposes only.
CAUTION: The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Indications, contraindications, warnings, and instructions for use can be found in the product labelling supplied with each device or at www.IFU-BSCI.com. Products shown for INFORMATION purposes only and may not be approved or for sale in certain countries. This material not intended for use in France.